intersystemic growth overriding psychological processes, and people now identify with what is monitoring their conscious activity. Ability to act towards a goal without being attached to the outcome.
Im not even sure what this is supposed to mean. Just a form of mindfulness, identifying thoughts as they appear
Two important things must be stated for these type of models.
1. People can be (and often are) in differnent areas of meta-development for different areas of their life. For example, some who relates to emotions from/within the frame of control, but to vocation from/within the frame of achievement, and liturgy from/withing the frame of rules.
2. 'Progressing' to a further state is less about acquiring more capability (which certainly happens); but it is more importantly about *retaining and maintaining* previous levels but housed in a higher dimensional mode of awareness.
Levels of Energy by Frederick Dodson makes a review of similar scales of this type. This book mentions The tone scale from Scientology, and a number of others developed by independent thinkers / spiritual gurus. I remember finding the book convincing that scales such as this are real and useful. Hoe Math's scale may have a bit more of a flavor of Christian morality than the others.
I don't agree with everything you said but I did learn a bit and even if you disagree you should look at others people's works to see if your ideas are faulty and need work
intersystemic growth overriding psychological processes, and people now identify with what is monitoring their conscious activity. Ability to act towards a goal without being attached to the outcome.
Im not even sure what this is supposed to mean. Just a form of mindfulness, identifying thoughts as they appear
“Not because it is the most advanced for of it, but because it is the final one”
Typo i think, for—>form
Notably Wilbur in Up From Eden said egoic reasoning emerged about 12kya. Works with the snake cult which is a model of how that could have spread
Two important things must be stated for these type of models.
1. People can be (and often are) in differnent areas of meta-development for different areas of their life. For example, some who relates to emotions from/within the frame of control, but to vocation from/within the frame of achievement, and liturgy from/withing the frame of rules.
2. 'Progressing' to a further state is less about acquiring more capability (which certainly happens); but it is more importantly about *retaining and maintaining* previous levels but housed in a higher dimensional mode of awareness.
True, fucking is something I enjoy quite a bit.
Levels of Energy by Frederick Dodson makes a review of similar scales of this type. This book mentions The tone scale from Scientology, and a number of others developed by independent thinkers / spiritual gurus. I remember finding the book convincing that scales such as this are real and useful. Hoe Math's scale may have a bit more of a flavor of Christian morality than the others.
I don't agree with everything you said but I did learn a bit and even if you disagree you should look at others people's works to see if your ideas are faulty and need work